All tools
Cloudflare Tunnel logo

Tunneling & Networking

Cloudflare TunnelFree tier and limits

Expose local services without opening ports. Free with Cloudflare Zero Trust for up to 50 users.

Sniffed 20d agoNo card needed#tunneling#zero-trust#cloudflared#self-hosting#reverse-proxy#cloudflare

Keeps your home server's ports closed while the world reaches the app. Cloudflare Tunnel connects a service to Cloudflare's network through an outbound connection, so you do not have to open a port on your firewall. Cloudflare's plans page lists a Zero Trust Free plan at $0 for up to 50 users, and a Cloudflare community reply confirms the free plan covers up to 50 users, with all seats billable once you move off the free 50. Cloudflare's access page shows a $7 tier for teams over 50 users, which I read as a per-user price but could not confirm. Reddit users in r/selfhosted like that it avoids port forwarding, adds a WAF and lets them limit requests by country, while others point to extra latency, a 100 MB upload limit per HTTP request and dependence on Cloudflare. A competitor's comparison says Quick Tunnels need no account. It suits public self-hosted services that already sit behind Cloudflare.

Free tier quotas

PlanZero Trust Free, $0
UsersUp to 50
PortsNo inbound port needs to be opened on your firewall
Access controlA WAF can restrict who reaches the service, per r/selfhosted
Quick TunnelsFree and no account, per a competitor's comparison
Paid tier$7 tier for teams over 50 users, unit not confirmed
ContractCustom pricing

Last sniffed Oct 5, 2026. Always confirm on the official pricing page.

πŸ‘ Good boy

  • +The plans page lists a Zero Trust Free plan at $0 for up to 50 users.
  • +A r/selfhosted commenter said tunnels mean you do not have to open a port on your firewall to host.
  • +The same commenter said Cloudflare also offers a WAF where you can restrict access. The rest of the sentence was cut off.
  • +A r/selfhosted user said they like it because they can limit requests to their country.
  • +A competitor's comparison says Quick Tunnels and named tunnels are both free, and Quick Tunnels need no account.
  • +A r/selfhosted poster called Tunnels great for public facing services you share with others.

πŸ‘Ž Watch out

  • βˆ’A r/selfhosted commenter listed increased latency as a disadvantage because traffic goes through an extra server.
  • βˆ’The same commenter mentioned a 100 MB upload limit in a single HTTP request. The excerpt was cut off.
  • βˆ’A r/selfhosted poster uses Tailscale for private services and keeps Tunnels for public ones.
  • βˆ’A r/selfhosted thread is titled 'Change my mind: Cloudflare Tunnels is the worst thing that happened to self-hosting culture', which shows some users object to routing traffic through Cloudflare. I read only the title.
  • βˆ’A Cloudflare community reply says all seats become billable once you move off the free 50 users.

The catch

Cloudflare's developer docs pricing page returned a 404 when I fetched it, so I could not read Tunnel-specific limits. The figure for the Zero Trust Free plan (up to 50 users, $0) comes from Cloudflare's plans page and a Cloudflare community reply. That Tunnel is free on that plan comes from Reddit and a competitor's comparison, not from a Cloudflare page I read. The $7 tier on Cloudflare's access page is for teams over 50 users. I read it as a per-user price but the excerpt did not say so. Traffic goes through Cloudflare, so you accept the extra hop. A r/selfhosted commenter lists added latency and a 100 MB upload limit per HTTP request as disadvantages, and the second figure was cut off in my excerpt. Check Cloudflare's current limits if you upload large files. I did not find a commercial-use statement or card requirement in the pages I read, so both are marked unknown.

What’s included

  • βœ“Outbound-only connection to Cloudflare
  • βœ“No open inbound ports
  • βœ“Works with Cloudflare WAF
  • βœ“Country-based request limits
  • βœ“Quick Tunnels without an account
  • βœ“Named tunnels
  • βœ“Zero Trust access control for up to 50 users

Free tier value

Generosity
B
Estimated value
$0 for up to 50 users
Feature parity
Free on Zero Trust Free for up to 50 users. Tunnel-specific limits not confirmed.

Screenshots

Cloudflare Tunnel homepage
Cloudflare Tunnel homepage
Cloudflare Zero Trust plans and pricing page
Cloudflare Zero Trust plans and pricing page

Paid plans

Zero Trust Free, $0

Listed for up to 50 users.

Paid tier, $7

Cloudflare's access page shows a $7 tier for teams over 50 users and solving narrow secure access cases without enterprise support services. The unit is not confirmed in my excerpt.

Contract, custom

Custom pricing for larger deployments.

Common questions

Is Cloudflare Tunnel free?

It is available on the Zero Trust Free plan at $0 for up to 50 users, based on Cloudflare's plans page, a Cloudflare community reply and Reddit.

Do I need to open ports?

No. A r/selfhosted commenter says tunnels mean you do not have to open a port on your firewall.

Do I need an account?

A competitor's comparison says Quick Tunnels need no account. Named tunnels use a Cloudflare account.

What are the downsides?

A r/selfhosted commenter lists added latency and a 100 MB upload limit per HTTP request. Some users object to routing traffic through Cloudflare.

What happens past 50 users?

A Cloudflare community reply says that once you move off the free 50 and add more seats, all seats are billable.

Should I use it for private services?

One r/selfhosted poster uses Tunnels for public services and Tailscale for private ones.

Change history

  • Checked October 22, 2026

    The plans page lists a Zero Trust Free plan for up to 50 users. The developer docs pricing URL returned a 404.

Sources

Alternatives to Cloudflare Tunnel

Other Tunneling & Networking tools with generous free tiers (5)

View all in Tunneling & Networking